
About three weeks ago,
Longstockings reader Niki emailed us this very excellent question:
"What is the proper protocol when you query an editor, they request the manuscript, months go by, you send a status, and still more months go by? Do you chalk it up or still hold out hope? Do you try and contact that editor again? I have this same problem with the same manuscript with at least four different publishers. Any suggestions?"
See? A very excellent question. One that, being an editor, I wanted to answer right away. So, after promising my fellow Longstockings that I would answer it, I promptly... did not. For three weeks.
Which, in a round about sort of way, actually illustrates the point I wanted to make to begin with: That editors are well-meaning, if insanely busy people, and sometimes they take for-eevvvvv-er to get back to the people who are waiting to be gotten back to.
Um, sorry about that, Niki.
But you already knew that editors were busy. And slow as molasses. What you wanted to know was what you should do about it. So here's the answer: Pester them. But nicely.
Case in point: in my company's editorial guidelines for submission, we state that we usually take about three months to respond to submissions. Now, often we get back much, much more quickly than that. Sometimes we don't. But because we say three months right up front, I get annoyed when people query me about a manuscript I've had for say, three weeks. After three weeks, that manuscript is most likely still ten inches deep in my TO READ pile (er, ten inches into one of my piles. At the moment I have seven. Yeah. Need to get crackin' on that....). So at that point I will often ignore the "Have you read you read my manuscript?" emails/letters because:
1) I haven't read it.
2) I'm irked that person is asking about it so soon.
3) The manuscript is probably so buried in my pile I would break my arms looking for it anyway.
So my advice is to know how long a publishing house usually takes to respond to manuscripts before pestering the editor.
HOWEVER. And here's a big however. If our guidelines say we respond in three months and it's been, say, four... well then it's my bad and you by all means should give me a nudge. Not a nasty "What the hell is taking you so dang long?" letter, but a gentle "Just wondering if the manuscript is under consideration" type deal. This will cause me to:
1) Feel like a schmoe.
2) Apologize for taking so dang long.
3) Move your submission to the top of my pile.
Another excellent reason to write to an editor if she's taken over an eon to get back to you is that, sometimes, she's not even the culprit. Sometimes she has passed the submission on to another reader, and your query is the extra incentive she needs to get that person to move the manuscript to the top of his pile. Because when an editor wants to acquire something, that something needs to be read by a lot of people, and all of those people are insanely busy. So sometimes, being a tad bit pushy can actually work in your favor. (Please only a tad bit, though--go stalker-crazy with the harassing and an editor who's on the fence about your work may decide you're not worth the bother.)
But in the case where an editor has specifically asked to see something, and then doesn't get back to you, even after an initial query, I would suggest emailing a nice letter asking if the manuscript is under serious consideration, and letting the editor know that if you don't hear back from her in a week or two, you'll be sending the manuscript off to other editors. This is totally fair on your part, and should also light a fire under the editor's derriere (and those of any subsequent in-house readers) .
Of course, if you'd submitted something and you've suddenly gotten an offer from another house, or you've acquired an agent in the meantime, you should definitely let the editor know right away. Nothing makes an editor bite faster than a little competition. (Side note, though: please don't lie about this. That is lame, and also, we'll probably figure it out, and then where will you be?)
Anyway, sorry for being so late in answering your question about lateness, Niki! But I hope this was at least a little helpful.
~lisa graff~